Search for examples of words and phrases in different Contexts. We have collected millions of examples of translation in different languages to help you learn languages and do your homework. Translate anywhere and anytime using the free PROMT mobile translator for iOS and Android. Constat enim quod Dei filius non pro parvo ad nos venit, sumens carnem nostram, sed pro magna utilitate nostra unde fecit quoddam commercium, scilicet quod assumpsit corpus animatum, et de virgine nasci dignatus est, ut nobis largiretur suam deitatem et sic factus est homo, ut hominem faceret Deum. But disruptive doctrinal effects would be valuable in and of themselves as a way for legal decision makers to set aside their usual subjective biases.Install language packages for offline translation on mobile devices and download PROMT AGENT, a plugin for pop-up translation in any Windows app, with a PREMIUM subscription. The model of self-disruptive doctrine cannot explain how judges ultimately resolve, or should resolve, legal questions. Investigating doctrine's disruptive potential might help explain why judges continue to reason doctrinally despite doctrinal indeterminacy. Drawing on performance theory and recent psychological studies of readers, I argue that judges' disciplined engagement with formal legal doctrine might have self-disrupting effects akin to those performers experience when they deliberately alter their physical and vocal habits. This article offers another model for how doctrine might influence judges' perceptions. Recently, however, some empirical studies have begun to consider the potential cognitive effects of judges' engagement with doctrine. Most of this literature focuses on doctrine's capacity to direct substantive outcomes and ignores other benefits that doctrinal reasoning might provide. Over the course of decades, various theories and methods have been proposed to justify judges' continued reliance on doctrine. Yet in many cases that come to court, the available authorities are acknowledged to be indeterminate. Legal doctrine, such as statutes and case law, is generally thought to contribute to legal decision making only to the extent that it determines legal outcomes, or at least narrows the range of justifiable outcomes. This article proposes a different way to think about legal reasoning that focuses on its psychological effects rather than its ability to identify legal outcomes. The analysis of the dissertation Circa praescientia daemonum shows us an interesting cross-section of the theological debates from the late Medieval philosophy to the XVII century and it brings light on the different ways to relate to historical sources starting from theoretical purposes. The Lüders’ text’s argument proceeds by a dense intertwine of sources, especially St. This is the topic of the Exercitium academicum circa praescientiam daemonum (1666), by Dietrich Lüders, published in the Reformed Jena in 1666. Among many works on divine foreknowledge, predestination and future contingents – commonplaces of the theological debates at least from the XIII century – our talk will focus on a dissertation devoted to the foreknowledge of the demons. Despite Voltaire’s irony against the theological debates and their subtilitates, between the half of the XVII century and the beginning of the Enlightenment’s century the number of thesis and academic dissertations on theological issues published in the European universities is really high.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |